If a contractor delivers non-conforming items, what is the legal standing once items are accepted?

When items are accepted, acceptance typically signifies that the government acknowledges that the items delivered meet the contract terms and therefore takes ownership of them. Acceptance is a crucial point in contract law, as it usually creates a situation where the risk of loss transfers from the contractor to the government.

Once the government accepts non-conforming items, it is often considered that the acceptance is final and legally binding, meaning that the government agrees to the terms of the delivery despite any defects or deviations from the contract specifications. The implications of this acceptance are significant: it limits the government's options to seek remedies or dispute the items further. Although there might be some ability to seek remedies such as asking for adjustments or sponsors for imperfections, the initial acceptance can impede stronger actions.

In contractual relationships, there are often stipulations about what constitutes acceptance and the consequences of that acceptance. By acknowledging receipt of the items, the government effectively solidifies its position, making the contractor’s obligations more complex if issues arise later. Thus, choice C reflects this understanding of the legal standing regarding accepted non-conforming items.